I'll try and speak to your experience with Macrium REFLECT based on my experience with the same.
HBS uses all CPU cores/threads available for imaging/compression, as a result it's a bit faster than REFLECT. This, of course, will depend on the speed of your processor and source/target disks. For restoration, a DELTA RESTORE (difference restoration) function is available (like REFLECT but not the DEFAULT, currently) and is actually a bit faster than REFLECT.
To my knowledge, Both AOMEI and EaseUS do not use a delta restore feature so FULL restores are what's available in those products... most likely much slower than either HBS or REFLECT. I do not CLONE disks so I have no experience there.
These observations are based on an 8-core, 16-thread CPU and NvME SSDs running at about 3gB/sec speed.
HBS uses all CPU cores/threads available for imaging/compression, as a result it's a bit faster than REFLECT. This, of course, will depend on the speed of your processor and source/target disks. For restoration, a DELTA RESTORE (difference restoration) function is available (like REFLECT but not the DEFAULT, currently) and is actually a bit faster than REFLECT.
To my knowledge, Both AOMEI and EaseUS do not use a delta restore feature so FULL restores are what's available in those products... most likely much slower than either HBS or REFLECT. I do not CLONE disks so I have no experience there.
These observations are based on an 8-core, 16-thread CPU and NvME SSDs running at about 3gB/sec speed.